- English version
- Articles
- Healthy skepticism
- The most dangerous and common false methods of treatment
Related posts
-
LIED-2018
The jury of the anti-award "LIAR-2018" decided that the contribution of RAS member Oleg Ilyich Epstein to pseudoscience is the most significant.
10 October 2018 -
Pseudoscience: danger rating
This rating was obtained by summarizing expert assessments of the dangers of existing misconceptions, pseudoscience and superstitions.
25 February 2014 -
Homeopathy financing: Where is the government looking?
According to experts, state support for homeopathy contributes to patients' rejection of traditional therapy based on the principles of evidence-based medicine.
30 June 2010 -
The state should not pay sorcerers. And homeopaths too
"Witchcraft is also a tradition – should it also be licensed?" – a member of the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives asked during the discussion on the prohibition of state funding of homeopathic clinics.
25 February 2010 -
Water, microwave, nanowire…
A lot has been written about the properties of water, misconceptions (and conscious deceptions) and it is not worth repeating. The main difference between "macro" water from "micro" and "nano" is that the authors of mystical hypotheses operate with familiar (trivial) concepts: memory, emotional impact, magnet, music, snowflake shape, etc. Any Chumak can "create" such water – without special knowledge and equipment.
31 March 2009